Independent educational resource. Not affiliated with any water-filter manufacturer, retailer, or installer. We do not recommend specific products. Sourced from EPA, NSF, CDC, and state health departments.
What Whole House Water Filters Actually Remove: A Contaminant-to-Technology Matrix
At a glance
Removal effectiveness depends on the technology, not the brand. NSF certification verifies that a specific product was independently tested for a specific contaminant claim. Without a relevant NSF/ANSI listing, "removes lead" or "removes PFAS" on a label is an unverified manufacturer claim. The matrix below maps each common contaminant to the technology recognised as effective by EPA, NSF, or CDC.
How to read this matrix
Rows are contaminants commonly tested in residential drinking water. Columns are the six filtration technologies a whole house system might include. Each cell answers a single question: is this technology recognised as effective against this contaminant? "Yes" means the technology is recognised by EPA, NSF, or both, and a properly certified product is independently verified. "Partial" means the technology can reduce the contaminant under some conditions but is not the primary recommended treatment. "No" means the technology is not effective. "n/a" means the contaminant does not apply to that technology.
Three caveats matter. First, removal claims require certification. A carbon block can pass NSF/ANSI 53 lead reduction or it can be a hardware-store cartridge with no testing - the technology is the same, the product testing is not. Second, removal effectiveness depends on contact time, bed depth, influent concentration, and pH. A GAC bed with 30 seconds of contact time will outperform the same bed with 5 seconds. Third, a single technology rarely handles every contaminant in real water; the typical whole house train combines two to four technologies in series.
Contaminant
Sediment
Carbon (GAC)
Carbon block
Reverse osmosis
UV-C
Softener
Primary source
Sediment / particulates
Yes
>= micron rating
Partial
captures fines
Partial
captures fines
Yes
pre-filter rejects
No
No
EPA Water Treatment Compendium
Chlorine (free)
No
Yes
NSF/ANSI 42
Yes
NSF/ANSI 42
Yes
upstream of membrane
No
No
NSF/ANSI 42
Chloramine (NH2Cl)
No
Yes
catalytic GAC
Yes
catalytic block
Yes
No
No
NSF/ANSI 42 chloramine claim
Lead (Pb)
No
Partial
only if NSF 53
Yes
NSF/ANSI 53
Yes
NSF/ANSI 58
No
No
NSF/ANSI 53; EPA LCR
PFOA / PFOS
No
Yes
NSF P473
Yes
NSF P473 / 53
Yes
NSF/ANSI 58
No
No
EPA 2024 PFAS NPDWR
Arsenic V (pentavalent)
No
No
No
Yes
EPA-recognised
No
No
EPA Arsenic Treatment
Arsenic III (trivalent)
No
No
No
Partial
oxidise first
No
No
EPA Arsenic Treatment
Nitrates (NO3-)
No
No
No
Partial
60-90% rejection
No
No
EPA Nitrate
Hardness (Ca/Mg)
No
No
No
Yes
removes ions
No
Yes
ion exchange
WQA hardness scale
Cryptosporidium / Giardia (cysts)
Partial
0.5 to 1 micron
Partial
if pleated
Yes
NSF 53 cyst
Yes
Yes
40 mJ/cm² at 254 nm
No
EPA UV Manual; NSF 53
Bacteria (total coliform, E. coli)
No
No
No
Partial
not certified
Yes
40 mJ/cm² at 254 nm
No
EPA UV Manual; CDC
Viruses
No
No
No
Partial
most rejected
Yes
higher dose
No
EPA UV Manual
Iron (dissolved Fe2+)
No
No
No
Yes
after oxidation
No
Partial
up to ~3 ppm
EPA Iron Treatment
Manganese
No
No
No
Yes
No
Partial
low concentrations
EPA Manganese Health Advisory
Disinfection byproducts (THMs, HAA5)
No
Yes
NSF/ANSI 53
Yes
NSF/ANSI 53
Yes
No
No
NSF/ANSI 53; EPA Stage 2 D/DBP Rule
VOCs
No
Yes
NSF/ANSI 53
Yes
NSF/ANSI 53
Partial
some rejection
No
No
NSF/ANSI 53
Microplastics (>1 micron)
Partial
if 1 micron
Partial
Partial
Yes
membrane retains
No
No
EPA CCL 6 / WHO 2019
Pharmaceuticals (PPCPs)
No
Partial
NSF/ANSI 401
Partial
NSF/ANSI 401
Yes
most rejected
No
No
NSF/ANSI 401
Radon (gas)
No
Partial
GAC tank, decay risk
No
No
No
No
EPA Radon in Drinking Water
Fluoride
No
No
Partial
activated alumina blends
Yes
85-95% rejection
No
No
EPA Fluoride; NSF/ANSI 58
Five things this matrix does not tell you
The matrix is a starting point, not a specification. Five caveats apply to every cell.
1. NSF certification is required for the "Yes" to be verified. A carbon block exists in two regulatory states: NSF/ANSI 53 certified for a specific contaminant claim, or not. The technology can adsorb lead in either case; only the certified product has been tested in an accredited lab to demonstrate it actually does. See NSF standards for the full list and verification procedure.
2. Influent concentration matters. A GAC bed treating 0.1 mg/L lead at 1 GPM will perform very differently from the same bed treating 5 mg/L lead at 8 GPM. Certification testing is done at defined challenge concentrations and flow rates that reflect realistic residential conditions; results outside those bounds may not hold.
3. Bed depth and contact time matter. Activated carbon adsorption is a contact-time phenomenon. A whole-house GAC tank with 30 seconds of empty bed contact time will outperform a small inline cartridge with 3 seconds of contact time, even if both nominally contain the same media. Carbon block cartridges achieve more contact time per unit volume than GAC because the block forces water through a denser matrix.
4. Some contaminants enter the water after the POE filter. Lead is the canonical example. Lead service lines and lead-tin solder joints in pre-1986 plumbing leach into water on the premises side of the meter. A carbon filter at the meter does nothing about lead released between the filter and the kitchen tap. EPA's Lead and Copper Rule treats lead primarily as a corrosion problem requiring corrosion control treatment at the utility and lead service line replacement, not as a source-water problem. POU filters at the kitchen sink are the right intervention. See our lead page.
5. Some technologies require pretreatment. A UV chamber cannot disinfect water that contains visible turbidity or iron precipitates, because UV-C cannot penetrate them. EPA's UV Disinfection Guidance Manual specifies a 5-micron sediment polish upstream of any UV stage. A whole-house RO membrane will foul rapidly without sediment and chlorine pretreatment; chlorine destroys most polyamide membranes. Stage order in a multi-stage train is a real constraint.
The standards behind each "Yes"
Each "Yes" in the matrix corresponds to a specific NSF/ANSI standard, EPA recognition, or CDC guidance document. The cluster looks like this:
NSF/ANSI 42 covers aesthetic effects: chlorine, taste, odour, particulates Class I to VI.
NSF P473 covers PFOA and PFOS reduction; the protocol is being incorporated into NSF/ANSI 53.
EPA UV Disinfection Guidance Manual (2006) defines 40 mJ/cm² at 254 nm as effective for bacteria, viruses, and cysts.
WQA hardness scale is the industry reference for grain-per-gallon thresholds and softener sizing.
Each subpage in the filter types section links the technology to the standards that apply to it. Each contaminant page in the contaminants section cites the EPA regulation or CDC guidance directly.
Common questions
Why does the matrix show RO as effective for almost everything?
Reverse osmosis is the most universally effective technology because it physically separates water molecules from larger ions and most organics through a semipermeable membrane. The trade-offs are real: whole-house RO produces 3 to 5 gallons of waste water per gallon of treated water, strips beneficial minerals, requires electrical pressurisation in many cases, and adds dissolved CO2 that can lower pH. Most credible sources prefer point-of-use RO at the kitchen sink for drinking water concerns and whole-house carbon for whole-home aesthetics.
Why is "UV" not effective against any chemical?
UV-C at 254 nanometres works by damaging the DNA of microorganisms, preventing them from replicating. It does not break down or remove dissolved chemicals like chlorine, lead, PFAS, or nitrate. UV is a complementary technology installed as a final disinfection step in a train that has already addressed sediment and chemical contaminants upstream. Without pretreatment, UV cannot perform.
Can a softener remove iron?
Partially, and with caveats. Ion-exchange resin can capture dissolved ferrous iron up to about 3 ppm, but iron above that level fouls the resin and shortens its service life dramatically. A dedicated oxidising or birm-media iron filter installed upstream of the softener is the proper approach for wells with measurable iron. Iron also stains the resin a characteristic rust colour even at low levels.
Why is sediment shown as "Partial" for cysts?
Cryptosporidium and Giardia cysts are typically 4 to 15 microns in size. A 1-micron absolute-rated sediment filter can capture them mechanically. A nominal 1-micron filter (which lets some particles above 1 micron pass) cannot. The distinction between absolute and nominal ratings matters here: NSF/ANSI 53 cyst certification requires absolute rating performance verified by particulate challenge testing.
Where does the matrix come from?
Every cell is sourced from one of: EPA{`'`}s Drinking Water Treatability Database, the relevant NSF/ANSI standard scope document, the CDC Healthy Water guidance pages, or peer-reviewed water-quality literature. Where sources disagreed or did not address a specific scenario, we marked the cell "Partial" rather than overstating effectiveness. The full source list appears in the Sources section below and on our <a href={`/sources`}>master sources page</a>.